Robert Pemberton · London, UK

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineer

Engineering Design Portfolio

This portfolio complements my CV by showing the design work behind the results: the level of detail in my CAD, the range of concepts and iterations I develop to reach an optimum solution, and how those designs become practical tools and hardware for research and production.

Some of my strongest CAD work cannot be shown publicly because it is protected by employer intellectual property. Where customer-product CAD is unavailable, I show the production, assembly and test tools I designed to manufacture and verify that hardware. No source CAD files are available for download.

CAD & DFM Prototype & Manufacture Test & Validation Production Implementation

Production Automation · Industry

INVISIO Communications · Production engineering

Automated Microphone Membrane Application Station

A four-part robotic gluing and pneumatic membrane-placement process developed to waterproof microphone housings while protecting acoustic performance and eliminating the variation of the original manual operation.

40% → 98% Production yield
4× Faster than manual gluing
4 Housings processed on each tray
25 Pneumatic outlets in three rings

The problem

Waterproof the microphone without changing its acoustic response

An existing microphone needed thin membranes bonded directly to the front and rear housings. Each seal required a circular adhesive bead followed by accurate placement and controlled pressure around the complete membrane lip.

Manual gluing produced variable bead width and occasional blobs. Excess adhesive could move away from the circular lip and across the membrane, causing inconsistent frequency-response results during acoustic testing. Rejected microphones then had to be broken apart so the internal assembly could be salvaged while the housings had to be discarded, wasting labor and production time.

The complete response

Control every stage instead of relying on individual operator technique

I replaced the hand-gluing operation with a robot program and designed removable four-part trays that locate the housings beneath the dispensing needle. I then replaced the upward-facing vacuum jig with hand-held vacuum/pressure stamps, a four-way pneumatic valve, UV curing and final pressure testing.

The same tray remains with all four housings after gluing. The operator no longer removes and flips each housing individually, reducing handling and keeping every part in a known position throughout the process. The aim was maximum consistency between operators, with every assembly remaining within the required acceptance band.

A repeatable circular path across four housings

The adhesive path is programmed as two connected arcs. Dispensing begins before the first arc and stops after the second; the robot then traces the same circle twice with the dispenser off to spread the adhesive evenly. Horizontal and vertical moves then index to the remaining housings on the four-part tray.

Original membrane process

Vacuum or off was not enough

The original fixture faced upward. An operator positioned a membrane with tweezers, slowly flattened it against six vacuum holes, then pressed a glued housing down onto it. Turning off the suction was expected to leave the membrane attached to the housing.

Pressure was difficult to apply evenly around the seal. Adhesive was often squeezed onto the fixture, allowing the membrane to remain stuck to the jig instead of the housing. The six vacuum points also allowed wrinkles that could alter the later acoustic response.

Redesigned membrane process

Vacuum, neutral and positive pressure

The new hand-held stamp uses vacuum to collect the membrane, neutral pressure while it is brought onto the adhesive, and positive pressure to release it deliberately onto the housing. This third state prevents the stamp from depending on passive release.

A four-way valve selects the state. In its center position both supplies are blocked, while the Dymax 5 relief valve protects the pneumatic source. In the air and vacuum positions, the unused supply is redirected through the hidden fourth port under the valve to atmosphere.

Real membrane-application station showing the four-way valve beneath the Dymax 5 and the manufactured stamp
Manufactured front stamp with the Dymax 5 pneumatic source and four-way control valve used for vacuum, neutral and positive-pressure operation.

Front and rear tools, outside and inside

Both stamps combine a secure grip, alignment guides and a mechanical depth stop. Internal channels divide one pneumatic connection into 25 outlets in three rings, supporting the membrane more evenly than the original six-hole jig and reducing wrinkles.

Front stamp Front microphone membrane vacuum stamp CAD model
Rear stamp Rear microphone membrane vacuum stamp CAD model
External tool geometryInterface-specific tools with the same operating principle.
Front cross-section Front stamp cross-section showing the internal pneumatic passages
Rear cross-section Rear stamp cross-section showing the internal pneumatic passages
Distributed pneumatic channelsThe central passage divides into three outlet rings.
1

Full-length knurled grip

Knurling across the body gives the operator a secure hold, reducing unwanted movement and making controlled placement easier.

2

High-contrast contact face

The surface touching the membrane is printed black. The contrast makes it immediately obvious whether a thin membrane is present and correctly located.

3

Three-ring flow distribution

Twenty-five outlets replace the original six vacuum holes, spreading support across the membrane and sharply reducing wrinkles.

4

Parallel alignment guides

External legs keep the contact surface parallel to the adhesive ring so one side cannot receive more pressure than the other.

5

Operator visibility

Gaps between the guide legs let the operator see the stamp approach and learn the correct placement motion without obscuring the joint.

6

Mechanical depth stop

Guide height creates a hard stop. Even at maximum hand force, the membrane can only travel to the experimentally established depth, making continuous contact without squeezing adhesive across the membrane.

Trial, manufacture and production release

The mechanical-stop height was established separately for the front and rear housings through physical trials. Each tool had to press firmly enough to close the complete adhesive ring without pushing material into the acoustic area.

The finished stamps were connected to the Dymax 5 through the four-way valve and introduced with the robot trays, curing process and pressure verification. The process was then adapted for additional microphone variants.

Production yield increased from 40% to 98%.

Automated gluing was four times faster than manual operator gluing. The complete station made adhesive coverage, membrane pressure and release repeatable while reducing acoustic rejects, material waste and rework.

Production Tooling · Industry

Fixtures shaped around the operator and the process

Production Jigs and Fixtures

Rapidly developed tooling that controls the critical geometry of each operation while keeping production fast, intuitive and maintainable.

3A

Universal Demagnetizing Fixture

The requirement

Several microphone variants had to be held at a repeatable height above an electromagnet. Each microphone sits in the black spring-contact tray shown above the blue fixture in the production photograph. Spring force changes the closed tray height between variants and also tries to push the tray back out of the fixture.

Problem with the original jig

The earlier station used a latch to resist the spring force. Inserting or removing a tray required one hand to operate the latch and a second to hold the tray, slowing a highly repetitive production task.

The mechanism

I replaced the latch with an adjustable friction bridge. The operator pushes the tray past light friction with one hand, and that same friction holds the tray at a controlled field position. An indexed screw is adjusted once for the microphone variant at the start of a production run and remains fixed for the whole batch.

The outcome

The additively manufactured fixture became a faster, universal station for multiple tray heights and was introduced at the supplier for production use.

CAD model of the universal microphone demagnetizing fixture
Adjustable fixture CAD The bridge accommodates several spring-contact tray heights while preserving a consistent position above the electromagnet.
Manufactured demagnetizing fixture with the black spring-contact tray visible above it
Production installation The black spring-contact tray slides into the blue printed fixture above the electromagnet; product information has been obscured.

3B

Repeatable Assembly from Awkward Manual Operations

Requirement

Assemble two components with two roll pins simultaneously using an existing hand press. Both pins had to remain directly above their holes throughout the stroke without permanently modifying the press.

Design response

The fixture separates the functions into a fixed base, a replaceable alignment bridge and an upper press attachment. Steel guide rods pass through the bridge to drive both pins into the suspension assembly.

Maintainability

The bridge contains the guide holes and is intentionally replaceable. If those holes wear, alignment can be restored without remaking the entire jig.

Implementation

Most components were 3D printed, with steel used in the pin-driving load path. The production fixture clips to the press and locates through the bed, creating a controlled process from existing equipment.

Verification Engineering · Industry

Adaptable long-duration durability testing

Life-Test Fixture

A maintainable, adjustable test platform for repeatedly flexing different product components through programmable distances when existing equipment could not reproduce the required long-duration loading.

The requirement

Adapt one fixture to multiple parts and flex distances

Products qualified for demanding service environments also require life testing to demonstrate long-term mechanical durability. The rig had to accommodate different components, mounting positions and flex distances while remaining easy to repair after a very high number of cycles.

Adjustable actuation

The linear actuator mount can move laterally and vertically to align with different test articles. Stroke distance is programmed electronically; when a required position lies outside the actuator's available travel, its mounting block can be relocated along the repeated hole pattern.

Maintainable structure

Sheet-metal plates are joined with replaceable corner brackets, through-bolts and nuts rather than permanent joints. Black printed covers protect the exposed bracket geometry. An electronics enclosure on the reverse side contains the actuator power supply and programming connection.

  • Rigid but fully serviceable bolted sheet-metal structure
  • Adjustable actuator position in multiple axes
  • Programmable stroke for different flex requirements
  • Relocatable mounting block extends the usable test range
CAD assembly of the adaptable life-test fixture
Complete test-rig CAD Actuator, adjustable supports and protected bolted structure packaged into a single maintainable fixture.

Designed for reconfiguration and repeated maintenance

The manufactured fixture uses the same adjustable actuator layout and bolted panel construction shown in CAD. The selected photograph omits sensitive product information while showing the production-scale structure and actuator.

Manufactured life-test fixture showing its adjustable linear actuator
Manufactured fixture with the linear actuator, support brackets and repeated mounting positions visible.

Aerodynamic Design · BEng

University of Surrey · Formula Student

Formula Student Rear-Wing Development

A three-element rear wing developed from first principles through 28 CAD and CFD iterations for the University of Surrey Formula Student car. The team placed fifth overall in the UK competition.

28 Aerodynamic design iterations
130 N Required downforce at 12 m/s
≈ 180 N Final isolated-wing downforce
5th Overall in the UK competition

Design requirements

Produce a measurable net benefit within Formula Student constraints

The rear wing had to exceed 130 N downforce at 12 m/s, cost no more than £660, remain below 8 kg excluding DRS and swan-neck mounts, and achieve a high-quality surface finish while satisfying the rulebook's working-volume, edge-radius, strength and stability requirements.

Why three elements

The Formula Student problem was not a scaled Formula 1 problem

A comparison with Formula 1 showed that the Formula Student working volume was 205% larger while its typical cornering speed was far lower. The wing therefore had to be developed for this operating point instead of copying a two-element Formula 1 arrangement.

1 43 N

Single element

Flow separated at 16° incidence and the concept remained far below target.

2 80 N

Stacked double wing

Interference between the two layers increased the drag penalty and still missed the requirement.

3 ≈ 180 N

Three-element B2

Attached flow, 97 N drag and aerodynamic efficiency of 1.8 at the 12 m/s design condition.

Geometry, numerical force data and flow visualization

Airfoil coordinates were transformed in Excel using scale, rotation and translation, then used to build the three-dimensional wing geometry in CATIA. Each iteration received a fine SimScale mesh and was evaluated at 12 m/s.

Pressure and viscous forces were resolved into downforce and drag, then compared with the previous version. Autodesk Flow Design visualizations showed separation, attachment and upwash, guiding position, chord and incidence changes of only a few millimeters or degrees at a time.

Airfoil geometry evaluated during Formula Student rear-wing development
Airfoil iteration set Candidate geometries developed and compared during the optimization process.
Separated flow · B6 Autodesk CFD visualization showing separated flow around rear-wing design B6
Attached flow · final B2 Autodesk CFD visualization showing attached flow around final rear-wing design B2
Flow visualization directed the iteration Separation around B6 compared with attached flow around the selected B2 geometry.
Upper portion of the Formula Student rear-wing CFD result table Lower portion of the Formula Student rear-wing CFD result table
CFD comparison Downforce, drag and aerodynamic efficiency across the B-series iterations.

Fifty newtons beyond the original target

B2 was selected because it combined approximately 180 N of downforce with 97 N of drag and visibly strong flow attachment. Designs producing more force carried much larger drag penalties and lower aerodynamic efficiency.

Moving from the earlier 80 N configuration to B2 increased downforce by about 100 N and exceeded the 130 N requirement by 50 N. Sharing its main airfoil section with the front wing also reduced the number of manufacturing molds.

Aerodynamic geometry prepared for CFRP manufacture

The team manufacturing concept separated each airfoil into upper, lower and corrugated internal sections for prepreg carbon-fiber construction. Structural detailing and swan-neck mounting were completed by other team contributors; these images show how my aerodynamic surfaces entered the wider assembly.

Rear-wing mold components for upper, lower and corrugated sections
Upper, lower and corrugated-section mold strategy.
Exploded view of carbon-fiber rear-wing components
Team-developed exploded CFRP assembly.

CFD history and Critical Design Review

The linked SimScale project shows the digital iteration history; the team CDR records the requirements, CFD method, results and manufacturing proposal.

Additional Design & Verification Work

Products, tooling, analysis and environmental testing

Further Engineering Evidence

Selected work across ruggedized product development, manufacturing, verification and sustainable-product tooling. Some client hardware is described without imagery.

Product redesign · Industry

Flagship Ruggedized Headset

Led a SolidWorks redesign addressing seven failure modes behind a 25% reject rate. The work combined root-cause investigation, DFM and production changes across 35 plastic and rubber injection-molded components, saving tens of thousands of pounds and improving production-tool life.

  • Root-cause investigation across product and process failures
  • Injection-molded plastic and rubber part redesign
  • Design reviews, tolerancing and supplier manufacture

Structural redesign · Validation

Boom-Arm Stiffness

Redesigned a headset boom-arm system to increase stiffness fourfold and remove unwanted movement in a severe vibration environment. The revised hardware was qualified through MIL-STD-810G vibration and ingress testing.

Product development · Creo/Windchill

Respirator Cables & Throat Microphones

Developed four headset-to-respirator cable assemblies and two throat microphones from CAD through manufacture and mass-production qualification, including salt- fog, thermal and cable-bend testing.

Custom test development

Helmet Softliner Compression

Designed cyclic-compression testing for two helmet softliners, using a mechanical roller to apply thousands of repeatable load cycles where standard equipment did not reproduce the required condition.

Sustainable products · Internship

Biodegradable Products & Mold Tooling

At Ecoinno, designed meal trays, coffee capsules and bottles in Siemens NX, then designed the wet molds used to collect recycled composite material and the heat- press tools used to form and finish each product.

CFD · BEng dissertation

Electric Ducted-Fan Cooling

Investigated the coupled aerodynamic and thermodynamic cooling performance of an electric ducted fan. ANSYS Fluent was used to evaluate and optimize duct-support geometry while accounting for its effect on cooling flow.

Manufacturing & quality

Sheet-Metal Production Engineering

Planned end-to-end manufacturing routes for aerospace and defense assemblies, generated FAIR documentation, verified tolerances with CMM and manual metrology, and led NCR/CAR root-cause containment. Nesting and routing improvements reduced waste, cost and energy use.

Visual clarity with a mechanical reason.

1

Purpose shapes the form

Geometry communicates how a part locates, moves, grips or carries load. Good visual design makes the operation easier to understand and harder to misuse.

2

Build early

CAD becomes useful when it meets real tolerances, materials, operators and equipment. Prototypes turn assumptions into specific improvements.

3

Measure the result

Yield, stiffness, noise, durability and test compliance show whether a design works. The strongest visual solution still has to earn its place mechanically.